Laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy: a comparative analysis of intraoperative risks and patient recovery rates

ORIGINAL SOURCE
Originally published in JOURNAL OF APPLIED MEDICAL SCIENCES; Vol. 9 No. 4 (2026): JOURNAL OF APPLIED MEDICAL SCIENCES; 62-64.

Jumanazarova, Mokhinur (2026) Laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy: a comparative analysis of intraoperative risks and patient recovery rates. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MEDICAL SCIENCES; Vol. 9 No. 4 (2026): JOURNAL OF APPLIED MEDICAL SCIENCES; 62-64.

[thumbnail of 405.pdf] PDF
405.pdf - Published Version

Download (235kB)

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of two primary surgical approaches forgallbladder removal: laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. The study evaluates the incidenceand nature of intraoperative complications, the severity of postoperative pain, and the overalltimeline of patient recovery. Based on clinical data, the superiority of minimally invasivetechniques regarding rehabilitation rates is confirmed, while the specific risks inherent to eachmethod are outlined.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Imported from JAMS
SWORD Depositor: Admin User
Depositing User: Admin User
Date Deposited: 26 Sep 2026 22:27
Last Modified: 26 Sep 2026 22:27
URI: https://universalpublishings.uz/id/eprint/13216

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item