COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF LEXICAL CHOICES IN E. FITZGERALD’S VS. E. HERON-ALLEN’S TRANSLATIONS OF OMAR KHAYYAM’S RUBAIYAT

ORIGINAL SOURCE
Originally published in PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS OF SCIENTIFIC AND INNOVATIVE RESEARCH; Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025): PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS OF SCIENTIFIC AND INNOVATIVE RESEARCH; 187-194.

Mamatova, Dilrabo (2025) COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF LEXICAL CHOICES IN E. FITZGERALD’S VS. E. HERON-ALLEN’S TRANSLATIONS OF OMAR KHAYYAM’S RUBAIYAT. PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS OF SCIENTIFIC AND INNOVATIVE RESEARCH; Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025): PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS OF SCIENTIFIC AND INNOVATIVE RESEARCH; 187-194.

[thumbnail of 9420.pdf] PDF
9420.pdf - Published Version

Download (276kB)

Abstract

This study examines the lexical strategies employed by Edward FitzGerald and Edward Heron-Allen in their English translations of Omar Khayyam’s Rubáiyát. Using five quatrains from each translator, the research analyzes patterns in word choice, metaphorical density, imagery, and cultural specificity. FitzGerald’s translation exhibits a poetic, imaginative lexicon that prioritizes aesthetic dramatization, symbolic imagery, and universalized philosophical reflection, whereas Heron-Allen’s lexicon emphasizes literal accuracy, ethical clarity, and preservation of Persian cultural and religious context. The comparison illustrates how lexical decisions shape interpretive and emotional impact, highlighting the broader tension between creative adaptation and philological fidelity in literary translation.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Imported from Problems and Solutions of Scientific and Innovative Research
SWORD Depositor: Admin User
Depositing User: Admin User
Date Deposited: 27 Sep 2026 22:18
Last Modified: 27 Sep 2026 22:18
URI: https://universalpublishings.uz/id/eprint/14491

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item