COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF TRADITIONAL AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS IN DISEASES OF THE CERVIX

Diseases of the cervix remain a significant challenge in gynecological practice due totheir high prevalence and potential impact on reproductive health. Surgical management plays acentral role in the treatment of cervical pathologies; however, the choice between traditional andminimally invasive approaches remains a subject of ongoing clinical debate. This study aims tocompare the effectiveness, safety, and postoperative outcomes of conventional surgicalinterventions and minimally invasive techniques used in the management of cervical diseases. Acomparative analysis was conducted based on clinical parameters, including intraoperativecharacteristics, recovery duration, complication rates, and preservation of cervical function. Thefindings demonstrate that minimally invasive surgical methods are associated with reducedoperative trauma, shorter hospitalization periods, and faster functional recovery, while traditionaltechniques continue to provide reliable therapeutic outcomes in complex or advanced cases. Theseresults highlight the importance of an individualized surgical strategy that considers disease severity,patient reproductive plans, and available clinical resources. The study contributes to optimizingsurgical decision-making and improving the quality of care for patients with cervical pathology